Moza AB6

[Kraft_87]

15 hours ago, Superflyer said:

 

 

Hello, Please take a close look at the technology, operation, etc., of airplanes. The engines of that era ran roughly at idle and minimal RPMs. The vibrations spread throughout the fuselage, affecting the rudder and also impacting the control stick. The more throttle you gave, the smoother the engine ran. You only notice very slight vibrations on the control stick. The vibrations during taxiing on the ground for takeoff or after landing are also realistic. The extension and retraction of the landing gear, flaps, etc., is also perceptible on the stick due to air resistance, turbulence, weight shifts, and so on. This varies, of course, depending on the aircraft type. The firing of the onboard weapons also causes vibrations that are transmitted to the control stick. I recently saw an interview with an English fighter pilot from the BOB who said that if they fired all 8 machine guns of the Hurricane or Spitfire, It was like driving into a wall. The plane was practically slowed down by about 40 km/h (or possibly 40 mph, I'm not sure if that translation was correct). There is also film footage showing the control stick vibrating strongly when the onboard weapons are fired. Moreover, none of us has ever flown such machines, so we can only try to recreate everything as authentically as possible based on recommendations, self-study of memoirs of former pilots, technical descriptions, our own certain technical understanding, etc. Furthermore, I can assure you, I have flown several times as a passenger in the last 20 years on an AN-2 (modernized M-62 engine of the I-16, for example), once on a Ju-52, several times on a Chesna, on a seaplane...., what do you think, how the AN-2, the Ju-52 vibrated, roared, how the control columns shook, even in the Chesna you can still feel a slight shudder. I would also be grateful for feedback, perhaps improvements, even criticism, so that together we can largely adapt to the reality of that time. Regards

 

 

 

Do you have profiles for some other planes? I would be grateful.
Thanks!

[ROSS_Papa_JA2]

19 часов назад, Superflyer сказал:

Hello, Please take a close look at the technology, operation, etc., of airplanes. The engines of that era ran roughly at idle and minimal RPMs. The vibrations spread throughout the fuselage, affecting the rudder and also impacting the control stick. The more throttle you gave, the smoother the engine ran. You only notice very slight vibrations on the control stick. The vibrations during taxiing on the ground for takeoff or after landing are also realistic. The extension and retraction of the landing gear, flaps, etc., is also perceptible on the stick due to air resistance, turbulence, weight shifts, and so on. This varies, of course, depending on the aircraft type. The firing of the onboard weapons also causes vibrations that are transmitted to the control stick. I recently saw an interview with an English fighter pilot from the BOB who said that if they fired all 8 machine guns of the Hurricane or Spitfire, It was like driving into a wall. The plane was practically slowed down by about 40 km/h (or possibly 40 mph, I'm not sure if that translation was correct). There is also film footage showing the control stick vibrating strongly when the onboard weapons are fired. Moreover, none of us has ever flown such machines, so we can only try to recreate everything as authentically as possible based on recommendations, self-study of memoirs of former pilots, technical descriptions, our own certain technical understanding, etc. Furthermore, I can assure you, I have flown several times as a passenger in the last 20 years on an AN-2 (modernized M-62 engine of the I-16, for example), once on a Ju-52, several times on a Chesna, on a seaplane...., what do you think, how the AN-2, the Ju-52 vibrated, roared, how the control columns shook, even in the Chesna you can still feel a slight shudder. I would also be grateful for feedback, perhaps improvements, even criticism, so that together we can largely adapt to the reality of that time. Regards

 

Полностью поддерживаю ваш пост! Но! Я говорил о движениях ручки РУСа в момент, когда двигатель еще не запущен! А винт механики медленно в ручную проворачивают для подготовки к запуску, была такая процедура ( в том числе и на И-153). Нет физических причин и сил для размашистых движений РУСа в этот момент! Но я допускаю, что программа моза "не понимает" это и заставляет делать размашистые махи руса. 

 

 

Edited August 13 by ROSS_Papa_JA2

[Trac]

8 часов назад, ROSS_Papa_JA2 сказал:

Полностью поддерживаю ваш пост! Но! Я говорил о движениях ручки РУСа в момент, когда двигатель еще не запущен! А винт механики медленно в ручную проворачивают для подготовки к запуску, была такая процедура ( в том числе и на И-153). Нет физических причин и сил для размашистых движений РУСа в этот момент! Но я допускаю, что программа моза "не понимает" это и заставляет делать размашистые махи руса. 

 

 

Может они имеют ввиду что другой техник в это время ходит вокруг самолета и дергает за рули и элероны?

[ROSS_Papa_JA2]

17 часов назад, Trac сказал:

Может они имеют ввиду что другой техник в это время ходит вокруг самолета и дергает за рули и элероны?

Судя с какой силой и размахом дергаются элероны, этот техник явно агент абвера или боевик Скорцени,  явно мой самоль хочет сломать!😄

[Superflyer]

Here is my profile for Me-109

Steuerprofil Me-109 Varianten.zip