FeuerFliegen Posted May 30 Posted May 30 I recall this being mentioned on the old forum, but I can't remember what was said about it. Is there a big difference between the LaGG-3 ser.29 that we have now, and the ser.66 that was the final variant and produced until 1944? Either way, can anyone tell me all of the specific differences? I'm wondering if it would make sense to have it in Great Battles, or if there isn't a big enough difference to justify it.
BlitzPig_EL Posted May 30 Posted May 30 The usual refinements for a later war VVS aircraft, better aero, better build quality, a bit more Vmax.
MDzmitry Posted May 30 Posted May 30 (edited) 13 минут назад, FeuerFliegen сказал: Is there a big difference between the LaGG-3 ser.29 that we have now, and the ser.66 that was the final variant and produced until 1944? Either way, can anyone tell me all of the specific differences? I'm wondering if it would make sense to have it in Great Battles, or if there isn't a big enough difference to justify it 1. Better overall quality of finish 2. Forward wing slats similar to La-5 3. Lighter airframe, putting it at ~2800 kg In terms of performance it was a huge leap for LaGG-3, but that leap only made it somewhat similar to the Yak-1B in speed, while still being a worse climber. Being a 1943 modification, that wasn't really enough to prove the LaGG-3-60 series worth producing en masse, and from the November of 1943 the factory in Tbilisi that was developing lightened LaGGs was ordered to start producing the new Yak-3. Edited May 30 by MDzmitry 1 3 1
Snowball Posted July 5 Posted July 5 Just learned about this variant being used in the kuban battle, it could have beenan amazing addition imo. After the faults of the early series were solved it became a decent plane , slower than the germans but very sturdy and simple to maintain. Not to be underestimated
MDzmitry Posted Monday at 03:16 PM Posted Monday at 03:16 PM 05.07.2026 в 16:27, Snowball сказал: but very sturdy Ironically, 60-series LaGGs experienced increased airframe failures due to extreme lightening of any part still heavy enough to be reduced
Snowball Posted Tuesday at 07:37 AM Posted Tuesday at 07:37 AM oh 🤨, well that's disappointing. At least it was faster
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now