Bulldog Posted February 19 Posted February 19 S! I have a gaming PC with a 5080 and 64 GB of fast RAM, etc. I had a Reverb G2 and a Pico 4 previously on a 4070Ti card and was not impressed with the visuals. However, I wish to dip back into VR waters. My squad pals have the Pimax Crystal but I have seen and heard horror stories on the lack of customer services. Indeed, I posted a thread on their VR Discord asking to what headset they would recommend to me and I was ignored. So... Do I wait until the Samsung XR is released in the UK? Then again, it may not be released over here. Or the Pimax Dream Air? However, see above. Any thoughts and suggestions would be appreciated. With very best wishes, Bulldog Quote
GiftGruen Posted February 19 Posted February 19 (edited) Well, you can get a Quest3 and be quite happy with it. Taking costs into account, it's probably unbeatable. Myself I moved from Quest to Crystal Light and ( after somewhat experimenting with ApacheStraps and several Settings ) now am quite happy with it. I am using a 5090 and anyway ( with my quite high settings in IL2 ) cannot use 100% resolution. However - quite a good pair. I cannot tell anything bad about the CrystalLight. But, hey, I never needed support and/or service so I am maybe just a lucky one. CrystalSuper (Oled) or DreamAir are the ones I personally think are the most interesting HighEnd ( and HighPrice) options in 2026. Edited February 19 by GiftGruen Quote
Panzerlang Posted February 20 Posted February 20 I have the Crystal and Super, no significant hardware issues with either and only minor software ones. Quote Gigabyte Aorus Elite Mobo. No mods. AMD 9800X3D CPU. No mods. RTX 5090 GPU. No mods. 64GB G-Skill RAM at 6000mhz. XMP on. Samsung SSD. Monitor at 3840x2160. Pimax Crystal Super.
Dash,Polder Posted Saturday at 04:19 AM Posted Saturday at 04:19 AM Pimax Crystal user also came from a G-2, I can witness they've stood behind their product and gave swift and prompt tech support, they've also honored their warranty no questions ask. I was actually impressed with the speed of the support from them. I think some get confused when they discover that support comes direct from China and your dealing with a very small window when both sides are awake and theirs has fixed business hours. That can cause some difficulty in having a conversation even more so than a language barrier, I'm used to it having some relatives on that side of the planet. All I can say is I love mine, it's fantastic flying unit, best one so far. It's one I can spend hours in with great eye comfort, I find it much harder on the eyes sitting in front of a flat screen for the same amount of time. Am thinking a bit about upgrading to an OLED super in the not so far future, but don't really see it as a necessity. I do use prescription lenses in all my HMD's and glasses for flat screen viewing. Find it ironic the easiest and most relaxed place for my old eyes seems to be in VR. Also say I put a lot of effort into proper fitment and added the custom comfort face fit kits and top strap, that's helped to turn it into a well fitting top notch fighting unit. 1 Quote
spreckair Posted Sunday at 09:44 PM Posted Sunday at 09:44 PM I have the same experience as Dash,Polder above. Someday I will likely upgrade, but not until so many things settle out a bit--computer upgrade prices, VR headset advances and prices, etc. For now, the PCL is keeping me very happy. Quote
Bulldog Posted Sunday at 10:11 PM Author Posted Sunday at 10:11 PM Mr Dash: would yours be the Crystal Light? Got my last Virpil delivery today. Am a happy dog! BD 2 Quote
chiliwili69 Posted Monday at 08:15 AM Posted Monday at 08:15 AM Here just to share my own impressions about the PCL, Quest3 and BSB2: https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/92536-bigscreenbeyond2-vs-quest3-vs-crystal-light-vs-monitor4k-through-the-lens-pictures/ https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/92592-bigscreenbeyond2-vs-quest3-ergonomics-and-comfort/ https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/88605-quest3-vs-crystal-light-through-the-lens-pictures/ VR headsets are very subjective, you never know until you try them. Apart from the three candidates above there is one to arrive before summer, which is the Steam Frame. Although the resolution is the same than your current G2 or Pico4, there are three things that might be worth: - horizontal and vertical FOV - edge-to-edge clarity - foveated streaming I will buy the Steam Frame as soon it is available to compare it with BSB2. Quote
Bulldog Posted Monday at 10:50 AM Author Posted Monday at 10:50 AM ChiliWili, Many thanks for this. So, in a nutshell, best wait for the Steam Frame perhaps. I liked the Pico 4 for its size but the colours were weak. I could not fly competitively with it but enjoyed solo flights. BD Quote
GiftGruen Posted Monday at 07:41 PM Posted Monday at 07:41 PM (edited) It's LED with 2.2Kx2.2K and they tell "FOV up to 110". So - maybe a great headset for occasional Gamers and a good competitor to Quest3 - but I don't expect it to be 'Peak'. Wireless connection alone needs to make compromise since wirelesse connection simply has not the bitrates of a tethered connection, even if done well. So it probably depends if you want to have a good allround headset - like Steam Frame or Quest - or a specialized HighEnd-thing for simulations. PS: Cool Virpil setup 😉 Edited Monday at 07:42 PM by GiftGruen Quote
chiliwili69 Posted yesterday at 08:08 AM Posted yesterday at 08:08 AM (edited) On 2/23/2026 at 11:50 AM, Bulldog said: I liked the Pico 4 for its size but the colours were weak I remember very well the Pico4, it was a great headset for the time it appeared (Sept-2022), well ahead of Meta at that time. It was the one of the first pancake lenses and FOVs were good. https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/81135-the-issue-with-the-pico4-mask/ https://forum.il2sturmovik.com/topic/81247-pico4-vs-index-vs-monitor4kfullhd-through-the-lens-pictures/ The main bottleneck of most of wireless headset without eye tracking (like Pico4 or Quest2/3/3S) is limited by the streaming decoding capacity of the XR2 chip on the device. For the H265 codec, the limit is 150Mbps for the XR2 1st-gen, and 200Mbps for the XR2 2nd-gen and XR2+ 2nd-gen. There are two versions of the Pico4, the original from 2022 (with XR2 1st-gen chip) and the Pico4 Ultra (with XR2 2nd-gen). The new Steam Frame will most likely offer you similar colors to the Pico4 since it is also based in LCD panels, but in terms of visual quality I expect better visuals over the Pico4/Pico4Ultra/Quest3 since it will use the eye-tracking feature to do foveated streaming, meaning that the limited decoding capacity (I really don´t know what is the chip of the Steam frame) will be used to give you more details on what you are looking (less compression) and less details on the peripheria (more compression). All this is just on paper, that´s why I would like to test it. In fact, the PlayForDream and SamsungGalaxyXR are also wireless devices with eye-trakcing which can run SteamLink and its foveated streaming functionality. But I am not interested in those devices because the limited FOVs. Edited 13 hours ago by chiliwili69 Quote
Bulldog Posted 23 hours ago Author Posted 23 hours ago Many thanks for this. I did have my eyes on the Samsung Galaxy XR but now have reservations. Perhaps it will be the Steam Frame. Not sure. Presently, I am giving a wide berth from anything Pimax. Have you ever thought about writing a book on VR headsets for the gaming community? BD Quote
chiliwili69 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 10 hours ago, Bulldog said: Presently, I am giving a wide berth from anything Pimax. Well, since I have the BSB2 I can not back to bulky headsets anymore, so Crystal Supers are out of my radar. The Pimax Air Dream is an option but they use MicroOLED (like BSB2), so FOVs are not great. If Steam Frame is giving me the same FOVs than the Index, I am sold. VR headsets are not only panel resolution (beyond certain value you have dismising returns), there are many other factors which can be more important than resolution: - Confort - Weight and rotational inertia - Quality of lens (resolving power, contrast preservation, aberrations,etc) - HFOV and specially VFOV! - GPU requirements (some devices has a large render/panel ratio -> waste of GPU power) - Software simplicity 10 hours ago, Bulldog said: Have you ever thought about writing a book on VR headsets for the gaming community? LOL, nowadays people don´t read books anymore, people watch youtubers and lately ask to AI. And the AI is fed from anything, including this forum... 😁😁 Quote
Bulldog Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago I think the Steam Frame may have promise. Many thanks, kind sir. As a book publisher, I hope this is not the case. This is unleashed soon. Cannot go wrong with a radioactive Japanese lizard. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.