zeus-- Posted February 12 Posted February 12 (edited) 25 минут назад, Nerpo сказал: Если бы не финны, я полагаю, и этой бы карты не было чтоли? Абсолютно верно полагаете. Все пожелания по флоту, новым самолетам для Финских ВВС, более 1000 уникальных исторических памятников архитектуры (которые так или иначе могут попадать на территорию этой карты) можете писать в личку автору проекта "Карта Финского залива" LLv44_Kanttori А направления взлета и мешающие взлету деревья мы исправим в будущих патчах. Собственно, как и другие вещи, которые мы обещали сделать по этой карте и о которых написано в на странице в магазине, рассказывлось в новостных видео и сообщениях на форуме. Edited February 12 by zeus-- 3 2 1 Quote
Sayan Posted February 12 Posted February 12 Читаю тут про лёд, сквозь который проваливаются ИИ-машины, и на память приходят "жидкие" причалы и набережные, на которые невозможно посадить самолёт игрока. И "жидкие"палубы корабликов, на которых невозможно разместить управляемую наземку. Жаль... Такие идеи были.... 1 Quote
Nerpo Posted February 12 Posted February 12 25 минут назад, zeus-- сказал: можете писать в личку автору проекта "Карта Финского залива" LLv44_Kanttori Так точно! Я обратил внимание, он внимательно просматривает все сообщения касательно этой карты! Спасибо за ответ! 🙂 Quote
Nerpo Posted February 12 Posted February 12 (edited) Музей Ладожской флотилии В КОНТАКТЕ https://vk.com/musladflot ============= Скрытый текст Не могу не отметить ЭТУ ссылку - https://vk.com/@-198470431-boi-za-ostrov-vuoratsu?subtype=primary Edited February 12 by Nerpo 1 Quote
Aapje Posted February 12 Posted February 12 6 hours ago, AndreiTomescu said: Trivia: he really did that, made it back with a fried engine, was praised and such, but never did anything worth mentioning in the war afterwards. [...] His name is Horia Agarici. He got some more kills and became an ace. He first commanded a squadron and then later commanded a fighter group and became chief of the operations' bureau. So I don't think it is fair to say that he didn't do anything worth mentioning later on. Quote
AndreiTomescu Posted February 12 Posted February 12 1 minute ago, Aapje said: He got some more kills and became an ace. He first commanded a squadron and then later commanded a fighter group and became chief of the operations' bureau. So I don't think it is fair to say that he didn't do anything worth mentioning later on. i know, i have all about him, including his memoires, his reports to the investigators (Securitate)= romanian secret police, everthing. This statement is his. I like him alot, that is why i mentioned him. But he stated that. Quote
Nerpo Posted February 12 Posted February 12 (edited) 10 часов назад, Sayan сказал: Читаю тут про лёд, сквозь который проваливаются ИИ-машины, и на память приходят "жидкие" причалы и набережные, на которые невозможно посадить самолёт игрока. И "жидкие"палубы корабликов, на которых невозможно разместить управляемую наземку. Жаль... Такие идеи были.... В общем вспомнил кампанию "Зимняя сказка" про Лагг-3, где они со льда взлетают. Сделал фейк филд на льду. И где у грузовика значит путь лежит на другую сторону залива, там прямёхонько создал ВПП. Хрен там - все равно ныряет под лед, собака! А далее запускаюсь и съезжаю на лёд на У-2 -- ваще без поблем! Езжу по льду (даже не по ВПП) взлетаю и сажусь. А машинки все тонут! КТО ЗНАТОКИ В ТЕМЕ??? КАК ПОБЕДИТЬ "ЖИДКИЙ ЛЁД"? Дорогу жизни как то надо делать же! Да.. объекты разные без проблем тоже на льду стоят. "blocks" которые. ВИДЕО-ШМИДЕО прилагаю https://youtu.be/Rsb5VOLZsJE Edited February 12 by Nerpo Quote
Sayan Posted February 12 Posted February 12 41 минуту назад, Nerpo сказал: КТО ЗНАТОКИ В ТЕМЕ??? КАК ПОБЕДИТЬ "ЖИДКИЙ ЛЁД"? Дорогу жизни как то надо делать же! НИКАКЪ! Тов. Зевс выше сказал, что для ДЖ нужно делать отмель искуственную. 1 Quote
Rothary Posted February 12 Posted February 12 12 hours ago, AndreiTomescu said: what I know is that both the Finns and maybe the Russian Navy had submarines there. I knew that the lake Ladoga was indeed populated with smaller sized submarines, like the Saukko, and maybe there were some Sch class ones? I don't know much about naval activity on Ladoga, but Saukko, despite indeed being originally intended to serve on the lake, ended up serving in the Baltic instead, alongside Finland's four other submarines. Its only act of war was in July 1941, launching one torpedo with near catastrophic results for the submarine itself with the crew only narrowly escaping the situation. 1 Quote
MajorMagee Posted February 12 Posted February 12 Quote To make AI vehicles stay on top of ice (i.e., prevent them from falling through, which happens when the game fails to detect the water/ice surface collision correctly) in the IL-2 Sturmovik: Great Battles (BoX) series, you must use the Mission Editor to set the vehicle's altitude properly and set the map season to winter. Here is how to ensure AI vehicles navigate ice surfaces: Set Map to Winter: In the Mission Editor, go to Mission Properties and ensure the season is set to Winter. This ensures the game recognizes the water as a solid icy surface rather than a water body that vehicles cannot navigate. Set Initial Position Correctly: Place the AI vehicles directly on the ice surface. If the vehicle is slightly below the water/ice level in the editor, it may fall through the map upon spawn. Adjust "Altitude" in Waypoints: If vehicles are falling through while moving, check the waypoint properties. Ensure the altitude is set to 0m or slightly above to stay on the surface. Use Ground Attack Commands: When directing vehicles across ice, ensure they are using "Follow Waypoints" rather than engaging in complex, steep pathfinding, as that can trigger the bug where vehicles fall through the ice. Avoid Steep Slopes: While ice is generally flat, if you are working on a map with sharp transitions from land to ice, ensure the AI is not trying to navigate a "steep slope" while transitioning, as this has been known to cause AI vehicle issues. Note: If the issue persists, ensure your map, such as in the "Ice Ring" campaign, is properly configured, as ice maps are designed with specific collision models for frozen surfaces. 1 1 Quote
Nerpo Posted February 13 Posted February 13 (edited) All mission parameters met! Altitude above sea level +0.4 (tried different options with a higher value). Season: Winter. Map: Winter. Ambient temperature: -15°C. still dives under water! Fellow developers! Do something about the parameters for vehicles weighing up to 2 tons!!! ВИДЕО-ШМИДЕО прилагаю. https://youtu.be/m8lOeaF4fUg Edited February 13 by Nerpo Quote
AEthelraedUnraed Posted February 13 Posted February 13 2 hours ago, Nerpo said: All mission parameters met! Altitude above sea level +0.4 (tried different options with a higher value). Season: Winter. Map: Winter. Ambient temperature: -15°C. still dives under water! Fellow developers! Do something about the parameters for vehicles weighing up to 2 tons!!! ВИДЕО-ШМИДЕО прилагаю. https://youtu.be/m8lOeaF4fUg Can confirm. Note that the weight is not the problem; it's whether or not they use the advanced physics model for playable vehicles. They are working on it though; not by changing the physics but by adding artificial shallows. Probably something to do with optimisation. 11 hours ago, MajorMagee said: Quote To make AI vehicles stay on top of ice (i.e., prevent them from falling through, which happens when the game fails to detect the water/ice surface collision correctly) in the IL-2 Sturmovik: Great Battles (BoX) series, you must use the Mission Editor to set the vehicle's altitude properly and set the map season to winter. Here is how to ensure AI vehicles navigate ice surfaces: Set Map to Winter: In the Mission Editor, go to Mission Properties and ensure the season is set to Winter. This ensures the game recognizes the water as a solid icy surface rather than a water body that vehicles cannot navigate. Set Initial Position Correctly: Place the AI vehicles directly on the ice surface. If the vehicle is slightly below the water/ice level in the editor, it may fall through the map upon spawn. Adjust "Altitude" in Waypoints: If vehicles are falling through while moving, check the waypoint properties. Ensure the altitude is set to 0m or slightly above to stay on the surface. Use Ground Attack Commands: When directing vehicles across ice, ensure they are using "Follow Waypoints" rather than engaging in complex, steep pathfinding, as that can trigger the bug where vehicles fall through the ice. Avoid Steep Slopes: While ice is generally flat, if you are working on a map with sharp transitions from land to ice, ensure the AI is not trying to navigate a "steep slope" while transitioning, as this has been known to cause AI vehicle issues. Note: If the issue persists, ensure your map, such as in the "Ice Ring" campaign, is properly configured, as ice maps are designed with specific collision models for frozen surfaces. Can you indicate your source please? This seems to be a load of bovine fecal matter. Quote
MajorMagee Posted February 13 Posted February 13 That was Gemini... Not sure if it means anything, but the user playable vehicles all have a Worldobjects LuaScript entry that the AI vehicles don't have. RiverDrops=false // Àðãóìåíòû âëàæíîñòè è êàïåëü ñòåêîë íå ðàáîòàþò íàä ðåêîé ïðè =false Quote
AEthelraedUnraed Posted February 13 Posted February 13 2 hours ago, MajorMagee said: That was Gemini... Yeah, generative AI tends to come up with stuff that sounds good, rather than that's true. One thing you can do to mitigate the problem is to ask it to verify using online sources. That makes it a little bit better, but even still, AI remains a completely untrustworthy source. 3 hours ago, MajorMagee said: Not sure if it means anything, but the user playable vehicles all have a Worldobjects LuaScript entry that the AI vehicles don't have. RiverDrops=false // Àðãóìåíòû âëàæíîñòè è êàïåëü ñòåêîë íå ðàáîòàþò íàä ðåêîé ïðè =false Well spotted. I recall doing some tests a year or so ago to see if I could get AI vehicles to drive on the ice. I think I already tested this and that it didn't work, but I'm not 100% certain anymore. Might be worth testing again. Otherwise, just wait a bit until the team has adjusted the map as indicated by zeus 🙂 Quote
JG4_Moltke1871 Posted February 13 Posted February 13 A question to the Yak-1 ser.23 Where is the rocket salvo panel located? Quote
1C Game Studios LukeFF Posted February 13 Author 1C Game Studios Posted February 13 2 hours ago, JG4_Moltke1871 said: A question to the Yak-1 ser.23 Where is the rocket salvo panel located? It doesn't have one; you either have to use technochat or just remember which firing mode you were last in. In other words, each button on the stick corresponds to a given firing mode (Fire One, Fire Pair, Fire Salvo). Works the same way as other planes but without the dedicated control panel. 1 Quote
jokash Posted February 14 Posted February 14 Will Odessa and Leningrad map be updated with quick mission generator options like other big maps? Quote
MajorMagee Posted February 14 Posted February 14 (edited) On 2/13/2026 at 9:23 AM, AEthelraedUnraed said: Yeah, generative AI tends to come up with stuff that sounds good, rather than that's true. One thing you can do to mitigate the problem is to ask it to verify using online sources. That makes it a little bit better, but even still, AI remains a completely untrustworthy source. Well spotted. I recall doing some tests a year or so ago to see if I could get AI vehicles to drive on the ice. I think I already tested this and that it didn't work, but I'm not 100% certain anymore. Might be worth testing again. Otherwise, just wait a bit until the team has adjusted the map as indicated by zeus 🙂 Adding the RiverDrops parameter didn't do anything. Changing these existing parameters to much higher values let them drive across the bottom and emerge on the other side unharmed. Not particularly useful for what we had in mind for the Ice Road. CriticalWaterLevel = 15 // The height of the water level CriticalHeigthLevel = 30 // The height of the water level Letting AI vehicles drive over the ice is probably something the developer could fix with a minute or two of work... Edited February 14 by MajorMagee 1 Quote
Rurik_54 Posted February 17 Posted February 17 Hello, dear friends! I imagined how the Church of the Aassumption of the Virgin Mary on Sennaya Square and the Trinity Cathedral (Izmailovsky) might look on the map. These buildings were in the city during the war and served as landmarks for German artillery and aviation. I think the map would be better with them included. There are empty spaces on the map of Leningrad for these buildings. Perhaps the developers could take this into consideration? 2 2 Quote
Jojy47 Posted February 18 Posted February 18 Is there any updated awarding and medals for this front/career? Like for example: Defence of Leningrad and Defence of Odessa for the Soviets and Eastern front Medal for the Germans etc and the Crimea shield etc... Also, the Bf-109 G10 for the Germans during the late war Leningrad fronts. Quote
1C Game Studios LukeFF Posted February 18 Author 1C Game Studios Posted February 18 37 minutes ago, Jojy47 said: Is there any updated awarding and medals for this front/career? Like for example: Defence of Leningrad and Defence of Odessa for the Soviets and Eastern front Medal for the Germans etc and the Crimea shield etc... They are planned, yes. 37 minutes ago, Jojy47 said: Also, the Bf-109 G10 for the Germans during the late war Leningrad fronts. The front had moved far to the west beyond Leningrad when the G-10 was first flown in the East. Quote
CzechTexan Posted February 19 Posted February 19 About the churches in Leningrad... they're probably just waiting for the models to be made. The map is far from finished. They are working on the Ice Roads too. Patience is required for this Sim in development. But I hope the ice roads get finished quickly 😁 2 Quote
Jojy47 Posted February 19 Posted February 19 (edited) 3 hours ago, LukeFF said: The front had moved far to the west beyond Leningrad when the G-10 was first flown in the East. But, the G-10 was by that time, used both on the eastern and the western fronts, either way, hope to see the G-10 added or something else from axis side and this can also be seen if added on the late states of the new Leningrad front and the western fronts. Edited February 19 by Jojy47 Quote
Bert_Foster Posted February 20 Posted February 20 LA7 Attitude Indicator. Seen the discussion so far. Seems strange the LA7 doesnt have the "option" available ... it has a suction venturi visible on the 3D model underside between the gear flipper doors 🙂 Be nice to have as a Mod option. 1 Quote
MDzmitry Posted February 20 Posted February 20 2 часа назад, Bert_Foster сказал: LA7 Attitude Indicator. Seen the discussion so far. Seems strange the LA7 doesnt have the "option" available ... it has a suction venturi visible on the 3D model underside between the gear flipper doors 🙂 Be nice to have as a Mod option. Not mentioned even as a possible equipment in 1945 (unlike RPK), let alone 1944. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.